Medires Publishers - Article

Archive : Article / Volume 1, Issue 2

Perspectives and Trends in Research Ethics: A Necessity

Nnodim Johnkennedy1*Ikem Amarachi Promise1Nwaokoro Joakin Chidozie2

1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Imo State University, Owerri Nigeria

2Department of Public Health, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria

Correspondng Author:

Nnodim Johnkennedy, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Imo State University, Owerri Nigeria

Citation:

Nnodim Johnkennedy, Nwaokoro Joakin Chidozie, Ikem Amarachi Promise. Perspectives and Trends in Research Ethics: A Necessity. J. Neur. Neurol. Disord. Vol. 1, Iss. 2, (2022). DOI: 10.58489/2836-8851/007

Copyright:

© 2022 Nnodim Johnkennedy, this is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Received Date: 03-12-2022   
  • Accepted Date: 16-12-2022   
  • Published Date: 27-12-2022
Abstract Keywords:

Research ethics, Activities, Regulation, Confidentiality

Abstract

Research ethics involves application of fundamental ethical concepts to research activities, such as the planning and carrying out of research, respect for society and other people, the use of resources and research outputs, scientific misconduct and the regulation of research. It is a crucial component of research that is affected by factors like public trust in scientists, data protection, anonymity, and confidentiality, as well as the capacity to establish and maintain relationships of trust with respondents. It encompasses not only the rules spelled out in a code of ethics, but also the researcher's philosophical and value viewpoint. The research ethics and its principle are x-rayed.

Introduction

The rules of behavior for scientific researchers are known as research ethics [1]. It is crucial to follow ethical guidelines in order to safeguard the welfare, rights, and dignity of study participants. It offers recommendations for conducting research ethically. In order to achieve a high ethical standard, it also trains and supervises scientists [2].

There are several reasons why research ethics are crucial. They support the objectives of research, such as knowledge expansion. They foster the principles of justice and respect that are necessary for teamwork [3]. Because scientific research depends on cooperation between researchers and groups, this is crucial. It aids in navigating the liminal space between ethically right and wrong. They provide the structure that helps make a decision one can be proud of. Without ethics, human behavior would be more akin to that of animals in the wild [4,5].

Research is therefore not only a valuable tool for adding to essential knowledge, but it is also the most trustworthy way to begin comprehending the complexities of various issues, to uphold integrity, refute falsehoods, and uphold significant truths, as well as to serve as the foundation for analyzing complex sets of data [6]. Without research, improvements that have helped some people and saved others' lives could not have been possible. Universities can provide students a more comprehensive educational experience by incorporating research into their programs, allowing them to investigate the outcomes of using novel mental processes through investigation and experimentation [7]. As a "global center of excellence for intellectual creativity," the research aims to anticipate problems in the future by pursuing the truth. It also aims to address social needs now and to contribute to the development of scientific technologies in order to realize a healthy and prosperous society [8]

When conducting any type of research, a number of ethical norms should be kept in mind. These ethical principles emphasize the need to (a) do good (also known as beneficence) and (b) do no harm as its central tenets (known as non-malfeasance). According to these ethical guidelines, in order to conduct research, you must (a) obtain informed consent from potential participants, (b) reduce the risk of harm to participants, (c) protect their anonymity and confidentiality, (d) refrain from using deceptive practices, and (e) grant participants the option to leave the study at any time [10].

In general, research should not only seek to benefit others (i.e., be beneficent), but also to prevent any harm from occurring (i.e., non-malfeasance). These are the fundamental rules of research ethics, even though they can differ between nations. This is crucial for both practical and ethical reasons, as failing to follow these fundamental guidelines could result in the research being criticized, potentially resulting in a worse grade, and/or being rejected by the supervisor or Ethics Committee, which would waste time and money [11].

Conclusion

Research Ethics are crucial and helpful, and require a great deal of interpretation. Therefore, it is crucial that researchers learn how to decipher, evaluate, and apply different research laws as well as how to decide what to do and how to behave morally under different circumstances.

References

  1. Bradburn, Jane, and Jane Maher. “User and carer participa- tion in research in palliative care.” Palliative medicine 19, no. 2 (2005): 91-92.
  2. Hurst, Samia A. “Vulnerability in research and health care; de- scribing the elephant in the room?.” Bioethics 22, no. 4 (2008): 191-202.
  3. Petrini, Carlo. “Informed consent from cognitively impaired persons participating in research trials: comparative law ob- servations.” Annali dell’Istituto superiore di sanità 47 (2011): 353-362.
  4. Covinsky, K. “The (Ir) relevance of medical research to older patients.” GeriPal (A geriatrics and palliative care blog) (2011).
  5. World Medical Association (1964), World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human
  6. Smith, Trevor. Ethics in medical research: a handbook of good practice. Vol. 16. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  7. Snape, Dawn, and Liz Spencer. “The foundations of qualitative research.” Qualitative research methods (2003): 1-23.
  8. Adamis, Dimitrios, Adrian Treloar, Finbarr C. Martin, and Alastair JD Macdonald. “Ethical research in delirium: argu- ments for including decisionally incapacitated subjects.” Sci- ence and Engineering Ethics 16 (2010): 169-174.
  9. Berghmans, Ron LP, and Ruud HJ Ter Meulen. “Ethical issues in research with dementia patients.” International journal of geriatric psychiatry 10, no. 8 (1995): 647-651.
  10. Tinetti, Mary E., and Stephanie A. Studenski. “Comparative effectiveness research and patients with multiple chronic con- ditions.” New England Journal of Medicine 364, no. 26 (2011): 2478-2481.
  11. Vollmann, Jochen. “Advance directives in patients with Alzhei- mer’s disease; Ethical and clinical considerations.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2001): 161-167.

Become an Editorial Board Member

Become a Reviewer

What our clients say

MEDIRES PUBLISHING

At our organization, we prioritize excellence in supporting the endeavors of researchers and practitioners alike. With a commitment to inclusivity and diversity, our journals eagerly accept various article types, including but not limited to Research Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Mini-Reviews, Opinions, and Letters to the Editor.

This approach ensures a rich tapestry of scholarly contributions, fostering an environment ripe for intellectual exchange and advancement."

Contact Info

MEDIRES PUBLISHING LLC,
447 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Suite #1734,
New York, 10013, United States.
Phone: +1 (786) 490-6788
WhatsApp us: WhatsApp - Medires Online
Email: info@mediresonline.org