Medires Publishers - Article

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Klebsiella pneumoniae complications with limited therapeutic options is considered as one of the major health issues concerning health care professionals worldwide. It is one of the leading nosocomial bacterial pathogens that causes urinary tract infection, and recently the antibiotic resistance of this pathogen has increased dramatically. The cross-sectional study was performed from September 2017 to the end of December 2017. This study aims at the isolation and antibiotic sensitivity of the Klebsiella pneumoniae among patients with sign and symptoms of UTI. 

Materials and Methods

About120 urine specimens collected were analysed for the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae. The antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolates was determined using the disc diffusion method. 

Results

: Of the 120 specimens, only 72 (60%) produced growth. The sensitivity test revealed that all the isolates were sensitive to levofloxacin, 30 isolates (14.2%) were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, 28 isolates (13.2%) were sensitive to gentamycin, 20 isolates (9.4%) were sensitive to travid, while Augmentin has the sensitivity of 17 (8.1%). It revealed that levofloxacin has the lowest resistance of 0 (0%) while travid has the highest resistance of 15(21.7%). 

Conclusion:

The antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolate revealed that all the isolates were completely sensitive to levofloxacin and more resistant to Augmentin and travid

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumonia is a Gram-negative opportunistic bacterium that causes infections in hospitalized or otherwise immunocompromised individuals [1]. The established site of predilection of the K. pneumonia infection is urinary tract including urethra, bladder, ureters, and kidney. Klebsiella UTIs occur using a urinary catheter for a long time in older women 

Klebsiella Pneumoniae is currently showing high resistance to antibiotics including beta-lactam antibiotics, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides [2]. This resistance is resulting in a growing worldwide problem regarding the choice of effective antibiotic treatment for hospital-acquired infections [2].

Β-lactam group are commonly prescribed worldwide and include penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems [3]. The production of β-lactamase enzymes by the presence of β-lactam-insensitive cell wall or the active expulsion of β-lactam molecules from Gram-negative bacteria represents the main indications of β-lactam antibiotic resistance [4] β-lactams such as Carbapenems are of choice for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria5, such as K. pneumoniae. These antibiotics are also considered as last resort for the management of life-threatening healthcare-associated infections6.  Bacterial resistance to carbapenems has been increased and is well documented [7], and has also been further complicated by the production of β-lactamases, efflux, and mutations that alter the expression and/or function of porins and penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) [8].

The spread of transmissible plasmids and the acquisition of resistance genes that normally occur by horizontal gene transfer, which may also carry virulence, are as the result of antimicrobial resistances [3]. For pathogen survival, the acquisition of resistance and virulent traits are, and some reports suggest that such may have an important role in the pathogenesis of 

K. pneumoniae

 infections [9]. Capsule, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), fimbriae (types 1 and 3), and siderophores are virulence factors that contribute to the pathogenicity of 

K. pneumonia

 strains can synthesize capsules of any of the serotypes 

K1

 to 

K78;

 however, K1 and K2 can also be associated with increased pathogenicity [7].

This study was conducted to isolate and investigate the antibiotic resistance of 

K.  pneumoniae

 isolates from urine samples

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted from September 2017 to the end of December 2017 in Lafia, Nasarawa state capital at Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital Lafia among patients suspected of signs and symptoms of UTI. Nasarawa state fondly called ‘Home of solid minerals. 

Sample size

A total of one hundred and twenty (120) patients showing signs and symptoms of UTI were sampled as determined using the sample size calculator of Krejcie and Morgan [10].

Collection of urine specimens

The urine specimens were collected from 120 patients (37 males and 83 females) with clinical symptoms of UTI and sent to the microbiology laboratory.  The patients with positive samples were detected; some information related to these patients, such as sex and age was obtained.

Consent and Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital Lafia before the commencement of the study. Informed consent was also obtained from each participant.

Isolation, identification, and antibiotic sensitivity test

Urine specimens were directly inoculated aseptically on MacConkey and Brain heart infusion agar (BHI) plates and incubated for overnight at 37oC. In the next step, the isolated bacteria were identified by Gram staining of bacterial colonies, colony character and biochemical tests, based on standard procedures and international Guidelines [11]. Susceptibility to a range of antibiotics that were available and routinely used in hospital was evaluated utilizing the method of disk diffusion according to the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Result

The highest percentage of K. pneumoniae isolates were from the individuals in the age range 46 years and above (27.7%) followed by age range 36-40 years (20.8%), 26-30 years (16.6%) and then between 31-35 years and 15-35 years had (9.7%), while the least prevalence age group of UTIs were in the 41-45years (5.5%). 

Table 1: Distribution of uropathogenic K. pneumoniae according to age and sex groups

The total number of 35 K. pneumoniae were isolated from the sexes. High isolate was observed among female aged 46 and above had (42.1%), followed by Male aged 36-40 had (37.5%), followed by Male aged 26-30 had (18.7%), Female aged 21-25 and 36-40 with (15.7%) each and the least isolated from both sexes aged 41-45 had (0%). The overall percentage of isolation of K. pneumonia from urine was (29.2%).

Table 2: K. pneumoniae isolated according to the age group and gender.

The total number of 35 K. pneumoniae were isolated and screened for their antimicrobial resistance and sensitivity towards different classes of antibiotics. The highest sensitivity of K. pneumoniae is 16.5% towards levofloxacin, followed by 15.1% to imipenem. While the other tested antibiotics showed less than 15%. On the other hand, the k. pneumoniae isolates showed high resistance against Augmentin 26.1%, while levofloxacin showed no resistance. The overall 29.2% of isolation of K. pneumonia from urine was recorded.

Table 3: Susceptibility of K. pneumonia isolated against different antibiotics

Discussion

Klebsiella pneumonia is one of the most common causes of Urinary tract infections in human beings. In this study, 120 urine specimens were collected for investigation. Females showed a significant rate (15.8%) of UTIs compared to males (13.3%). The result of this study showed that Female are more prone to UTI (urinary tract infection) compared to the Male, this may be due to their anatomy and reproductive physiology that quick bacterial access to the bladder [12,13]. One potential reason that could enable the auto transmission and increase the rate of UTIs in women could be related to the closeness of the genital tract and the urethra and anus [14,15]. 

The prevalence of K. pneunonia (29.2%) in this study is almost high as the percentages reported in Ethiopia (19-21%) [16] and Cameroon (18.5%) [17]. In Morocco, urinary K. pneumoniae was
isolated in 10% and 28% of the urine samples in the Meknes [18]and Rabat [19] regions, respectively.

Over the past two decades there has been wide use of extended broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents to meet the emerging challenge of treating UTIs due to gram-negative bacilli. However, these microbes have developed multiple antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, including enhanced drug efflux, alterations of the drug target and the production of plasmid-mediated -lactamases [20]. The typical characteristic of antimicrobial resistance is that there are often
great differences temporally and regionally [21,22]

Antibiotic sensitivity screening was determined by the zones of inhibition using the disc diffusion method for sensitivity test. For sensitivity to antibiotics, the isolates gave the following results, levofloxacin16.5%, ciprofloxacin 14.2%, gentamycin 13.2%, Augmentin 8.15, travid 9.4%, reflacin 10.9%, nitrofurantoin 12.3%, imipenem 15.1%. The pathogen was resistance to the antibiotics as follows levofloxacin 0%, ciprofloxacin 7.3%, gentamycin 10.1%, Augmentin 26. 1%, travid 21.7%, reflacin 17.3%, nitrofurantoin 13.0%, imipenem 4.3%.

The resistance rate in K. pneumonia was 14.2% to ciprofloxacin which is lower than other studies conducted in India [23] and United State of American [24]

Multi- drug resistance (MDR) is a major concern in the management of uropathogens [25]. This MDR may be due to the plasmids harboring several resistance genes which are transferred from one bacterium to another. Multidrug Resistance (MDR) in K. pneunomiae is of high increase throughout the world [26]

The pathogen has the highest sensitivity to levofloxacin probably because levofloxacin is not commonly used in treating K. pneumoniae infections, so strains resistant to it has not emerged. 

The highest resistance found against Augmentin followed by travid can probably be as a result of development of multidrug resistance due to prolonged use of these drugs against the pathogen within or outside the hospitals. Travid and reflacin produced a limited amount of sensitivity respectively probably due to multi-drug resistance that may be acquired from drug resistance plasmids and the frequent use of these antibiotics.

Conclusion

Indiscriminate use of antibiotics has resulted in the emergence and survival of resistance strains of bacteria isolates, thus antibiotic sensitivity is crucial for determining the choice of antibiotics. Levofloxacin as revealed by this work was effective against most of the bacterial isolates and would do well if used in therapy.

Competing interest

The Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

1. Gorrie O. and Ahmad S. (2017) Pattern of urinary tract infection in Kashmir and antimicrobial susceptibility. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull.; 38(4); 79-83.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
2. Davies D. Use of urinary gram stain for detection of urinary tract infection in childhood. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2010:75-73.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
3. Rahma S. (2018) Urinary Tract Infections in Children. Iran. J. Pediatr. Soc. 2(1);9-14.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
4. Wilke NK, Alpay H, Ozek E, Akman I, Bilgen H. (2005) Neonatal urinary tract infections: analysis of the patients and recurrences. Pediatr. Int.;46(6);21-25.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
5. Karuniawati H, Brink A. (2013) Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gramnegative fermenters. South. Afr. J. Epidemio. Infect.;8(2); 22:2-4.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
6. Amjad R, Ojha CR, Sijapat K, Singh SK. (2011) Bacterial Pathogen Responsible for Urinary Tract Infect. Med. J. Shree Birendra Hosp.;11(2); 13-16.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
7. Paterson, Hujer, Yeiser, Bonomo, Rice, Bonomo GM. (2017) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.;2 (4); pp29
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
8. Papp-Wallace A, Anwar N, Cheema T, Shehzad H. (2011) Prevelance of bacteria in urinary tract infections among children. Biomedical;22(14);139-142.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
9. Da Silva, Mendonça M, Valdes L, Alos JI, Garcia-Rey, C, Dal-Re, R, Garcia-de-Lomas J. (2012) Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Escherichia coli isolates from uncomplicated cystitis in women over a 1-year period in Spain. Rev. Esp. Quimioter.; 20(6); 68-76.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
10. Krejcie, Morgan. (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement; 30:607-610
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
11. John AS, Mboto CI, Agbo B. (2016) Euro. J. Exp. Bio. 6(4): 7-11
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
12. Magliano E, Grazoili v, Deflorio L, Leuci A, Roman P, (2012) Coccuzza EE. Scientific journal: ;36(4); 349-597
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
13. Dsouza L, Al-Momani T. (2017) Microbiological study of urinary tract infection in children at Princess Haya Hospital in south of Jordan. Middle East J. Family Med.;3(5); 2
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
14. Minnardi D, Cantoro D, Conti A, (2011) Muzzonigro G.Int.Gen.Med.; 4(3); 333-43
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
15. Paczosa, Mecsas K. (2016) Multidrug resistant microorganisms causing neonatal septicaemia. In a tertiary care hospital Lahore Pakistan. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.; 7(19); 1896-1902.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
16. Tenssaie ZW. (2001) Multiple antimicrobial resistance in gram negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens, Jimma Hospital, southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J;39:305–12.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
17. Pieboji JG, Koulla-Shiro S, Ngassam P, Adiogo D, Njine T, Ndumbe P. (2004) Antimicrobial resistance of Gram-negative bacilli isolates from inpa- tients and outpatients at Yaounde Central Hospital, Cameroon. Int J Infect Dis; 8:147–54.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
18. Lahlou A, Chegri M, L’Kassmi H. (2009) Épidémiologie et résistance aux antibiotiques des entérobactéries isolées d’infections urinaires à l’hôpital militaire Moulay-Ismail de Meknès. Antibiotiques; 11:90–6.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
19. Tlamcani Z, Ellaia K, Benomar A, Kabbaj H, Alaoui AE, (2009) Seffar M. La résistance aux fluoroquinolones chez des souches de Klebsiella spp. productrices de betalactamase à spectre étendu isolées dans les urines. Ann Biol Clin;67:553–6.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
20. Tenover FC. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Am J Med 2006;119(6 Suppl. 1): S3–10, discussion S62–70.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
21. Perez F, Endimiani A, Hujer KM, Bonomo RA. (2007) The continuing chal- lenge of ESBLs. Curr Opin Pharmacol; 7:459–69.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
22. Revathi G, Puri J. Bacteriology of burns. Burns. 1998; 24(4):347-49. [15]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
23. Wise R, Andrews JM. (1998) Local surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet;22(352):657–8
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
24. Fedler KA, Biedenbach DJ. (2006) Assessment of pathogen frequency and resistance patterns among pediatric patient isolates: report from the 2004 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program on 3 continents. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis.; 56(4):427-36.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
25. Akram M, Shahid M. (2007) Etiology and antibiotic resistance pattern of community- cquired urinary tract infections in JNMC Hospital Aligarh, India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 6:4
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
26. Tokatlidou D, Tsivitanidou M. (2008) Outbreak caused by a multidrugresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clone carrying blaVIM-12 in a university hospital. J Clin Microbiol.; 46(3):1005-08.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar