Medires Publishers - Article

Abstract

A specific, accurate, precise, robust and cost effective HPTLC method was developed and validated for quantitative analysis of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine in fixed dose combination. The separation was carried out on pre-coated TLC plates with Silica gel 60 F254 as stationary phase using Chloroform: Ethyl acetate: Methanol (7.5:2:0.5 v/v/v) as the developing system followed by densitometry measurement of bands at 280nm. The separation of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine was found to be at the following RF values 0.3 and 0.63 respectively. Calibration curves were found to be linear over the concentration ranges 400-4000ng/band, 80- 800ng/band for Telmisartan and Azelnidipine with correlation coefficient 0.9957 and 0.9966 respectively. Accuracy was found between 98.03% - 102% and 98.72% - 102 % for Telmisartan and Azelnidipine respectively. LOD was found to be 1.04% and 1.6% and LOQ was found to be 3.49% and 5.57% for Telmisartan and Azelnidipine respectively. The results showed that the proposed HPTLC method is reliable for routine analysis for simultaneous determination of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine without any interference.

Introduction

Hypertension is defined as a sustained increase in blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg, a criterion where risk of hypertension-related cardiovascular disease is high enough to merit medical attention. Blood pressure is the lateral pressure exerted by blood on the wall of the blood vessel while flowing through it. It’s produced due to cardiac output and peripheral resistance. [1]

Telmisartan is chemically 2- [4- [[4-methyl-6-(1-methylben- zimidazol-2- yl)- 2- propyl benzimidazol-1- yl] methyl] phenyl] benzoic acid. Telmisartan is an Angiotensin II Type-I receptor (AT1) Blocker. Reported data suggests that Telmisartan is Sparingly soluble in methanol, slightly soluble in water. Telmisartan was rapidly absorbed by oral administration. Excretion was found to be by biliary excretion in the urine 0.91 % and 0.49 % of total radioactivity.[2] The structure of Telmisartan is given in Figure 1.

Figure1: Chemical Structure of Telmisartan [3]

channel of smooth muscle in vascular muscles in vascular walls, induces smooth muscle contraction, contributing to hypertension. Azelnidipine was found to be absorbed with a Tmax of 3 h. After multiple Doses, the Tmax is about 21 hours. Azelnidipine is metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and excreted by Feces (80%) and Urine (20%). The structure of Azelnidipine is given in Figure 2 [4].

Figure2: Chemical Structure of Azelnidipine [5]

A review of literature reveals that various analytical methods are available for estimation of individual drugs. It includes UV spectrophotometry [6-8], HPLC [9-10], RP-HPLC [14- 16], stability indicating HPTLC [17-18]. Based on literature survey it was found that there was no any simple and HPTLC method available for the simultaneous estimation of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine in fixed-dose combination.

Methods

Material and Instrumentation

Telmisartan and Azelnidipine were procured from Precise Chemipharma Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra. HPLC grade Methanol, Acetonitrile and Loba Chemie Water were used. All other chemicals were analytical reagent grade. Chromatographic analysis was carried out using Camag HPTLC instrument using CAMAG vision CATS software for data acquisition.

Chromatographic Condition

The Chloroform: Ethyl acetate: Methanol in the ratio of (7.5:2:0.5 v/v/v) were used as mobile phase. Development was done through twin trough chamber previously saturated with mobile phase. The saturation time was 15 minutes. Migration distance was 80 mm and detection were carried out at 280 nm.

Preparation of Standard Stock Solution

A standard stock solution for Telmisartan and Azelnidipine of 1000 μg/ml was prepared using methanol as a diluent.

Preparation of Working Solution of the Mixture of Tel- misartan and Azelnidipine

A working solution of 400 μg/ml of Telmisartan and 80 μg/ml of Azelnidipine were prepared by appropriate dilution.

Calibration Standards

The calibration curve was plotted over a range of 80 to 800ng/ band and 400 to 4000ng/band for AZE and TEL respectively. 1,2,4,6,8,10 µl of standard stock solution was applied to each band on TLC plate using Hamilton Syringe by ATS 4 applicator at 280 nm.

Method Validation

Analytical Validation Parameters for the analysis of the proposed method were determined according to ICH Q2 guideline. The parameters such as linearity, range, accuracy, precision and specificity, robustness, LOD and LOQ were performed.

Linearity

The linearity response of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine was determined by analyzing six independent level of calibration curve at concentration range of 400-4000ng/band &80- 800ng/band respectively. For each drug a series of standard solutions were applied on the same plate as separate spots, densitograms were developed under optimized chromatographic conditions and analyzed at 280nm.calibration graphs were plotted by taking peak area (y axis) against the corresponding amount of the drug (x axis).

Accuracy and Precision

The accuracy of the method was performed in triplicate at three different concentration levels of 50, 100 and 150% of the targeted concentrations of the drugs. The accuracy of the method was evaluated by calculating percentage recovery. Repeatability was performed under 6 replicates at the assay concentration of TEL and AZE. Intraday and Inter day variations TEL and AZE were performed in triplicate at three different concentration levels of 50, 100 and 150%. Results are expressed in form of RSD.

Specificity

Comparison of standard and sample solution of TEL and AZE was used for determination specificity of the method. The sample confirmation was performed by comparing the Rf values and spectra of the sample with the reference standard.

LOD and LOQ

The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of Quantitation were calculated as per formula given in ICH Q2 (R1) guideline. LOD= 3.3 x Standard deviation/ Slope LOQ= 10 x Standard deviation/ Slope

Robustness

The robustness of the method was established by introducing small deliberate change in experimental conditions like flow rate, pH of mobile phase, and mobile phase composition. For robustness analysis, experiments were done in triplicate.

Results

Optimized Condition for Method Development

After investing through various mobile phase concentrations, the best retention factor was achieved on Silica Gel 60 F254 plate with mobile phase composition of Chloroform: ethyl acetate: methanol (7.5:2:0.5 v/v/v) as diluent. The detection wavelength was 280 nm. The retention factor obtained of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine were obtained as 0.3 and 0.65 respectively. The >optimized chromatogram and optimized conditions are mentioned in Figure 3 and Table 1.

Table1: Optimized Chromatographic Conditions

Figure3(a): HPTLC chromatogram of Standard solution of TEL & AZE

Method Validation

Linearity

The calibration curve of TEL & AZE was found to be in the concentration range of 400 to 4000 ng/band and 80 to 800 ng/band respectively with correlation coefficient of 0.9957 and 0.99666, respectively. Linearity graphs are indicated in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Table 2.

Table2(a): Linearity data for TEL

Figure3(b): HPTLC chromatogram of test solution of TEL & AZE

Table2(b): Linearity data for AZE

Figure4: Linearity graph of Telmisartan

Figure5: Linearity chart of Azelnidipine

Accuracy

The developed HPTLC method was found to be accurate as %Recovery was found in the range of 98.03%, to102% for TEL and 98.72% to 102 % for AZE are mentioned in Tables 3 & 4.

Table3: Accuracy data for TEL

Table4: Accuracy data for AZE

Precision

Repeatability and intermediate precision are expressed in terms of RSD. The RSD was found to be <2 indicating the developed method is precise. The results are summarized in Tables 5, 6 & 7 respectively for repeatability and intermediate precision.

Specificity

Excipient’s interference was not observed at working wave- length of 280 nm, as % interference was found to be less than 0.6% in both the drugs. The HPTLC chromatogram of both the drugs is mentioned in Figure 6 & 7 of TEL and AZE respectively.

LOD and LOQ

LOD and LOQ were found to be 1.04 ng/ml and 3.49 ng/ml for TEL and 1.6 ng/ml and 5.57 ng/ml respectively.

Robustness

Small but deliberate change was done in experimental parameters. The % RSD was found to be less than 2% as specify that the method is robust. Results are presented in Table 8 & 9 indicated that the selected factors remained unaffected by a small variation of these parameters.

Table5: Repeatability data of TEL & AZE

Table6: Intraday Precision data of TEL & AZE

Table7: Interday Precision data of TEL & AZE

Figure6: HPTLC chromatogram of TEL

Figure7: HPTLC chromatogram of TEL

Table8: Robustness data for TEL

Table9: Robustness data for AZE

Discussion

The method depends on separation and Quantitation of TEL &AZE on pre-coated with silica gel HPTLC 60 F254 as stationary phase using chloroform: ethyl acetate: methanol (7.5:2:0.5v/v/v) as developing system followed by densitometry measurement of bands at 280nm. The method was developed with a minimum amount and reduced number of organic solvents as mobile phase which results in more sensitive and cost-effective method. In present method, Telmisartan and Azelnidipine were separated with the difference in RF values of 0.3 and 0.63 respectively. Based on the literature review, it was revealed that no any method was developed for simultaneous estimation of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine by HPTLC.

Conclusion

A simple rapid HPTLC method was developed for simultaneous estimation of Telmisartan and Azelnidipine in tablet dosage form, which provides sufficient resolution between both the drugs. The developed method was validated by testing its linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD, LOQ and robustness and results were found within the acceptance criteria as per ICH Q2 (R1) guideline. the Statistical analysis has proven that the developed method is suitable for simultaneous estimation of both the drugs in pharmaceutical analysis and routine analysis without any interference.

References

1. Tortora, Gerard J., and Bryan H. Derrickson. Principles of anat- omy and physiology. John wiley & sons, 2018.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
2. Drug profile of Telmisartan, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ compound/Telmisartan, Accessed on June 2022.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
3. Structure of Telmisartan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telmisar- tan, Accessed on June 2022.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
4. Drug profile of Azelnidipine, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ compound/Azelnidipine, Accessed on June 2022.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
5. Structure of Azelnidipine, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azel- nidipine, Accessed on June 2022.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
6. Pradhan, Kishanta Kumar, Uma Shankar Mishra, Aurobindo Sahoo, Kanhu Charana Sahu, Debananda Mishra, and Ranjit Dash. "Method development and validation of Telmisartan in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms by UV Spectrophoto- metric method." International Journal of Research in Pharma- ceutical Sciences 2, no. 4 (2011): 526-530.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
7. Rathod, Sonali D., P. M. Patil, Santosh SA Waghmare, and P. D. Chaudhari. "UV-spectrophotometric method for estimation of telmisartan in bulk and tablet dosage form." International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 3, no. 10 (2012): 3936.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
8. Raskapur KD, Patel MM, Captain AD (2012) UV-spectropho- tometric method development and validation for determination of Azelnidipine in pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 4: 238- 240.
   View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar